Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Lyes Ameddah <lyes(dot)amd(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes
Date: 2018-01-10 02:55:09
Message-ID: 20180110025509.GF336@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 01:46:55PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-01-09 10:23:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Michael Paquier
> > <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 10:46:18PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> > >> I agree, this makes more sense. I've made this change in v3 of 0003.
> > >
> > > Based on the opinions gathered on this thread, 0001 and 0002 seem to be
> > > in the shape wanted, and those look good for shipping.
> >
> > Committed 0001.
>
> FWIW, I think in the future it'd be good to develop new features outside
> of a thread about "vacuum crashes".

You are right atht this is bad practice. Partially my fault for not
recommending the move to a new thread.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2018-01-10 03:35:19 Re: BUG #15001: planner cann't distinguish composite index?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-01-10 02:53:31 Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-01-10 03:12:38 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-01-10 02:53:31 Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes