Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Date: 2018-01-07 19:05:27
Message-ID: 20180107190526.GA27803@arthur.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 06:28:13PM +0300, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
> There are issues to do:
> - add the GUC-variable for hash table limit
> - fix bugs
> - improve comments
> - performance testing

Here is the second version of the patch.


Fixed some bugs and added the GUC variable "shared_dictionaries".

Added documentation for it. I'm not sure about the order of configuration parameters in section "19.4.1.
Memory". Now "shared_dictionaries" goes after "shared_buffers". Maybe it
will be good to make a patch wich will sort parameters in alphabetical


Fixed some bugs, regression tests pass now. I added more comments
and fixed old. I also tested with Hunspell dictionaries [1]. They are
good too.

Results of performance testing of Ispell and Hunspell dictionaries will
be ready soon.

1 -

Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional:
Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-ispell-memory-handling-v2.patch text/plain 1020 bytes
0002-Retreive-shmem-location-for-ispell-v2.patch text/plain 10.9 KB
0003-Store-ispell-structures-in-shmem-v2.patch text/plain 87.6 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-01-07 19:31:57 jsonpath
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-01-07 16:13:55 Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes