From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: @postgresql is now live |
Date: | 2018-01-06 00:25:48 |
Message-ID: | 20180106002547.GW2416@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
* Justin Clift (justin(at)postgresql(dot)org) wrote:
> On 2018-01-05 22:45, Joe Conway wrote:
> >On 01/05/2018 02:41 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> >>>On Jan 5, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>On 01/05/2018 06:21 AM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> >>>>The Twitter account will contain a mix of automated and manual
> >>>>postings
> >>>>that are all community-oriented. We’re excited to have another way
> >>>>for
> >>>>us to better engage with our users as we continue to modernize our
> >>>>advocacy efforts.
> >>>
> >>>Shouldn't this be sent to announce? (I'm behind working through my
> >>>postgres mail, so perhaps I haven't seen it yet?)
> >>
> >>Maybe: we’ve been focused on getting it up and developing content,
> >>that in all honesty it did not cross my mind. Is there precedent
> >>for an announcement of this nature?
> >
> >I'm not sure, but it seems that since this twitter account is explicitly
> >a community resource, it should not be an issue to use another community
> >resource (namely the announce list) to drive adoption.
>
> +1 :)
+1, it's been discussed before and I agree that we should send something
to -announce, just need to figure out when/how.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-01-06 16:40:23 | Re: @postgresql is now live |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-01-06 00:25:10 | Re: @postgresql is now live |