| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |
| Date: | 2018-01-05 23:51:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20180105235115.73ea64bzplxe7ebh@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-01-05 14:20:59 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
> >
> > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving)
>
> Hmm. We don't normally do things like this, because it breaks translatability.
Also, leaving translatability aside, why was *any* of this backpatched?
Unless there's very good maintainability reasons we normally don't
backpatch minor refactorings?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-01-05 23:57:55 | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-05 20:22:51 | pgsql: Factor error generation out of ExecPartitionCheck. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-01-05 23:57:55 | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-05 22:23:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |