Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2018-01-04 14:30:10
Message-ID: 20180104143010.bnmryjsqix4p24a7@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Wow, that was a stupid oversight, thanks for pointing it out. Here's a
> version that applies to today's master, and fixes this problem.
> No other changes.

v11 fixes the dependency problem I mentioned in
and adds some test to cover that stuff.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v11-0001-Local-partitioned-indexes.patch text/plain 157.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-01-04 15:47:50 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-01-04 14:29:30 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning