Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql
Date: 2002-08-16 20:26:42
Message-ID: 20177.1029529602@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> Is there any reason to create new constraint triggers? Could the
> CONSTRAINT clause be removed after a couple of releases?

Not without breaking existing pg_dump files. It will be many releases
before you will be able to sell that idea...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-17 02:14:25 Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-08-16 20:22:55 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE()