Re: postgresql9.5 partition table

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: mark <pgroad(at)163(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql9.5 partition table
Date: 2017-12-29 13:46:04
Message-ID: 20171229134604.2sqdt56sfhtknkct@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

mark wrote:
> I defined a table using 1000 partition tables.
> When I deleted or updated this table. It used a lot of memory and
> postmaster process is killed by OS. When I defined the same table
> using 100 partition tables. It can normally be updated and deleted.
> what is reason of this?

Postgres 9.5 is not prepared to deal with thousands of partitions.

You can try the improved partitioning with the new syntax introduced in
Postgres 10 -- you may have better luck there. Please test it.
If it still doesn't work, let us know in detail what you tested and how
it failed.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mark 2017-12-29 14:05:08 Re: postgresql9.5 partition table
Previous Message mark 2017-12-29 13:21:09 postgresql9.5 partition table