From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries |
Date: | 2017-12-26 16:55:57 |
Message-ID: | 20171226165557.w2zd3tdlr6gqq33b@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Arthur Zakirov wrote:
> Implementation
> --------------
>
> It is necessary to change all structures related with IspellDict:
> SPNode, AffixNode, AFFIX, CMPDAffix, IspellDict itself. They all
> shouldn't use pointers for this reason. Others are used only during
> dictionary building.
So what are you going to use instead?
> It would be good to store in a shared memory StopList struct too.
Sure (probably a separate patch though).
> All fields of IspellDict struct, which are used only during dictionary
> building, will be move into new IspellDictBuild to decrease needed
> shared memory size. And they are going to be released by buildCxt.
>
> Each dictionary will be stored in its own dsm segment.
All that sounds reasonable.
> The patch will be ready and added into the 2018-03 commitfest.
So this will be a large patch not submitted to 2018-01? Depending on
size/complexity I'm not sure it's OK to submit 2018-03 only -- it may be
too late.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-12-26 17:23:32 | Re: Deadlock in multiple CIC. |
Previous Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2017-12-26 16:48:27 | [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries |