Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2017-12-20 21:25:03
Message-ID: 20171220212503.aamhlrs425flg47f@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I modified the regression test so that a partitioning hierarchy would be
left behind after the test is run, which is useful to test pg_upgrade
and pg_dump -- this caught one small bug. That and some reading of the
diff resulted in v8, attach.

On my system, make check-world passes. However, Thomas Munro's
automated patch tester seems to have a problem with the pg_upgrade test,
though I don't know what it is.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Local-partitioned-indexes.patch text/plain 145.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-12-20 21:36:03 Re: domain cast in parameterized vs. non-parameterized query
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-12-20 21:20:28 Re: Bitmap table scan cost per page formula