Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze

From: AP <pgsql(at)inml(dot)weebeastie(dot)net>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze
Date: 2017-12-16 06:57:29
Message-ID: 20171216065729.ejppugsw7dorwwpa@inml.weebeastie.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 09:08:23AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
> The estimation depends on the type of columns and stats. I think we
> need to use schema and stats in the way AP is using to see the effect
> AP is seeing. I was under impression that AP will help us in
> verifying the problem as he can reproduce it, but it seems he is busy.

Different fires keep springing up and they are causing delay. This
is still on my mind and I'll get back to it as soon as I can. My
apologies. :(

AP

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-12-16 07:26:24 Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-12-16 03:54:03 Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze