Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2017-11-30 12:03:06
Message-ID: 20171130120306.vze3zc3lbl7izcht@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > Here's the remaining bits, rebased.
>
> At least patch 3 has conflicts with HEAD. I am moving this patch to
> next CF per a lack of reviews, switching status to waiting on author.

Thanks, will submit a new version before the start of the next
commitfest.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2017-11-30 12:29:57 Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-11-30 12:02:36 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table