Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date: 2017-11-19 15:13:51
Message-ID: 20171119151350.GA23853@arthur.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:37:40PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> I had hard time parsing this, but from your examples I assume you're talking
> about passing little bit different arguments to `fetch` function (am I
> right?).

Yes, I meant to pass the following arguments:

Datum source, SubscriptingRefState *state, bool *isNull

I think it is time to mark the patch as "Ready for Commiter". I've
marked it.

--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-11-19 17:26:39 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Previous Message Arthur Zakirov 2017-11-19 14:47:35 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().