| From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Cc: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, funny(dot)falcon(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions |
| Date: | 2017-11-17 04:35:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20171117.133555.250037971.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
At Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:24:08 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20171117(dot)132408(dot)85564852(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> > Well, even the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() can be called unconditionally yes.
> > It just seems like it's needless call as we'll call both in for loop
> > anyway if we take the "slow" path. I admit it's not exactly big win
> > though. If you think it would improve readability I can move it.
>
> I think this is the last message in this thread so I changed the
> status of the CF entry to "Waiting for Author".
Hmm. Somehow the last patch and Robert's comment * which is the
base of the patch * has been reached me in reverse order.
I found that the patch is the latest one and will look this
soon. Sorry for the ignorance.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-11-17 05:33:11 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-11-17 04:24:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions |