Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, funny(dot)falcon(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions
Date: 2017-11-17 04:35:55
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


At Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:24:08 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20171117(dot)132408(dot)85564852(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> > Well, even the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() can be called unconditionally yes.
> > It just seems like it's needless call as we'll call both in for loop
> > anyway if we take the "slow" path. I admit it's not exactly big win
> > though. If you think it would improve readability I can move it.
> I think this is the last message in this thread so I changed the
> status of the CF entry to "Waiting for Author".

Hmm. Somehow the last patch and Robert's comment * which is the
base of the patch * has been reached me in reverse order.

I found that the patch is the latest one and will look this
soon. Sorry for the ignorance.


Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-11-17 05:33:11 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-11-17 04:24:08 Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions