Re: Schedule for migration to pglister

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schedule for migration to pglister
Date: 2017-11-16 15:34:06
Message-ID: 20171116153406.GM4628@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Magnus, all,

* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> mbox access should now be restored, and as Stephen says, now handled by the
> Date in the message. Let me know if there are any issues with the new ones.
> (They're now generated by the same code as the per-thread ones).

And just fyi, that also means that complete threads end up in each mbox,
so you'll see cases where a message was posted to, eg, -committers
initially but the reply cc'd hackers, bringing the thread over there,
and now the initial email to -committers and all of the subsequent
emails on the thread will be included in the mbox for both -hackers and
-committers.

Hopefully everyone finds that to actually provide a better experience,
but it's a difference to be aware of.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-11-16 15:36:40 Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-11-16 15:27:29 Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2017-11-16 15:51:41 Re: Schedule for migration to pglister
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2017-11-16 15:20:48 Re: Schedule for migration to pglister