Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2017-11-13 17:55:35
Message-ID: 20171113175535.bvlfra6lm5rnoja2@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Somehow I managed to include an unrelated patch as attachment. Here's
another attempt (on which I also lightly touched ddl.sgml with relevant

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Simplify-index_-constraint_-create-API.patch text/plain 14.9 KB
v4-0002-Get-rid-of-copy_partition_key.patch text/plain 4.2 KB
v4-0003-export-generateClonedIndexStmt.patch text/plain 6.6 KB
v4-0004-Allow-indexes-on-partitioned-tables.patch text/plain 109.4 KB
v4-0005-allow-indexes-on-partitioned-tables-to-be-unique.patch text/plain 20.7 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-11-13 18:01:13 Re: [HACKERS] ginInsertCleanup called from vacuum could still miss tuples to be deleted
Previous Message Gregg Jaskiewicz 2017-11-13 17:46:55 Re: Migration to PGLister - After