Re: BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vincent Lachenal <vincent(dot)lachenal(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request
Date: 2017-11-10 23:23:04
Message-ID: 20171110232304.fgeoubpgqrkng77o@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2017-11-10 18:06:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Interesting. I wonder whether __int128 has an alignment requirement that
> is more than MAXALIGN. Intel chips generally don't enforce alignment
> requirements, but maybe there's an exception here?

As long as no SIMD instructions are used... Which'd be compiler version
and flag specific.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message digoal 2017-11-11 08:34:15 BUG #14899: not null constraint cann't improve the planner
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-10 23:06:55 Re: BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request