Re: pow support for pgbench

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Raúl Marín Rodríguez <rmrodriguez(at)carto(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: pow support for pgbench
Date: 2017-10-30 12:37:16
Message-ID: 20171030123716.u4y22lm4tmwmv4cu@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:

> Attaching patches directly to a thread is a better practice as if
> github goes away, any Postgres developers can still have an access to
> any code you publish using the public archives on

Also, by posting to pgsql-hackers indicating intention to integrate to
Postgres you're implicitly making a statement about the license of your
contribution; see the second half of the last paragraph at

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksandr Parfenov 2017-10-30 12:40:32 Re: Flexible configuration for full-text search
Previous Message Alexander Kuzmenkov 2017-10-30 12:25:50 Re: PoC: full merge join on comparison clause