Re: unique index violation after pg_upgrade to PG10

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chris Lexvold <lexvold(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: unique index violation after pg_upgrade to PG10
Date: 2017-10-24 18:30:19
Message-ID: 20171024183019.GM21735@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:27:14PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:14:53PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> > Note:
> > I run a script which does various combinations of ANALYZE/VACUUM (FULL/ANALYZE)
> > following the upgrade, and a script runs nightly with REINDEX and pg_repack
> > (and a couple of CLUSTER), so you should assume that any combination of those
> > maintenance commands have been run.
> >
> > In our reindex/repack log I found the first error due to duplicates:
> > Tue Oct 24 01:27:53 MDT 2017: sites: sites_idx(repack non-partitioned)...
> > WARNING: Error creating index "public"."index_61764": ERROR: could not create unique index "index_61764"
> > DETAIL: Key (site_office, site_location)=(CRCLMT-DOEMS0, 1120) is duplicated.
> > WARNING: Skipping index swapping for "sites", since no new indexes built
> > WARNING: repack failed for "sites_idx"
> > reindex: warning, dropping invalid/unswapped index: index_61764
> >
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> This sounds like a pg_repack bug and not a PostgreSQL bug. What version are
> you running?

Really ? pg_repack "found" and was victim to the duplicate keys, and rolled
back its work. The CSV logs clearly show that our application INSERTed rows
which are duplicates.

[pryzbyj(at)database ~]$ rpm -qa pg_repack10
pg_repack10-1.4.2-1.rhel6.x86_64

Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2017-10-24 18:48:55 Re: unique index violation after pg_upgrade to PG10
Previous Message Kenneth Marshall 2017-10-24 18:27:14 Re: unique index violation after pg_upgrade to PG10