Interest in a SECURITY DEFINER function current_user stack access mechanism?

From: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Interest in a SECURITY DEFINER function current_user stack access mechanism?
Date: 2017-10-18 20:01:12
Message-ID: 20171018200110.GA4496@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It'd be nice if SECURITY DEFINER functions could see what user invoked
them, but current_user is the DEFINER user, naturally, since that's how
this is done in fmgr_security_definer().

I was thinking that fmgr_security_definer() could keep a global pointer
to a linked list (with automatic nodes) of the save_userid values. Then
we could have a SQL function for accessing these, something like
pg_current_user(level int) returning text, where level 0 is
current_user, level 1 is "the previous current_user in the stack", and
so on, returning null when level is beyond the top-level.

This seems like a simple, small, easy patch, and since I [think I] need
it I suspect others probably do as well.

Thoughts?

Nico
--

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-10-18 20:15:01 Re: Interest in a SECURITY DEFINER function current_user stack access mechanism?
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2017-10-18 19:54:54 Re: [GENERAL] huge RAM use in multi-command ALTER of table heirarchy