| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Still another race condition in recovery TAP tests |
| Date: | 2017-10-13 05:04:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20171013050410.GC492314@rfd.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:57:24PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 6 October 2017 at 14:03, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:32:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (I do kinda wonder why we rolled our own RecursiveCopy; surely there's
> >> a better implementation in CPAN?)
> >
> > Fewer people will test as we grow the list of modules they must first install.
>
> Meh, I don't buy that. At worst, all we have to do is provide a script
> that fetches them, from distro repos if possible, and failing that
> from CPAN.
>
> With cpanminus, that's pretty darn simple too.
If the tree had such a script and it were reliable, then yes, it would matter
little whether the script procured one module or five.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-10-13 05:19:02 | Parallel safety for extern params |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-10-13 05:02:29 | Re: BLK_DONE state in XLogReadBufferForRedoExtended |