From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | milist ujang <ujang(dot)milist(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BDR, wal sender, high system cpu, mutex_lock_common |
Date: | 2017-10-12 03:03:50 |
Message-ID: | 20171012030350.f6ixcglsnqooyu6j@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2017-10-12 10:25:43 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 4 October 2017 at 00:21, milist ujang <ujang(dot)milist(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Can you get stacks please?
> >>
> >> Use -g
> >
> >
> > # Events: 2K cpu-clock
> > #
> > # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> > # ........ ........ ................. ............................
> > #
> > 86.96% postgres [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __mutex_lock_common.isra.5
> > |
> > --- __mutex_lock_common.isra.5
> > read
>
>
> Unfortunately it looks like you're using a postgres built with
> -fomit-frame-pointers (the default) on x64, with an older perf not
> built with libunwind. This produces useless stacks.
Just read this mail, but for libunwind to work you'd have to specify
"--call-graph dwarf", no?
- Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-10-12 03:10:20 | Re: BDR, wal sender, high system cpu, mutex_lock_common |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-10-12 02:25:43 | Re: BDR, wal sender, high system cpu, mutex_lock_common |