| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Hernandez <aht(at)ongres(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Gregory Brail <gregbrail(at)google(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output |
| Date: | 2017-09-25 17:18:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20170925171857.sn4nzck2ytdj3uww@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-09-24 13:36:56 +0300, Alvaro Hernandez wrote:
> However, if DMS uses it for what I'd call production use, I assume it is
> actually production quality. I bet they do enough testing, and don't ship
> software to potentially millions of customers if it doesn't work well. So...
> first, I'd consider this a a sign of robustness.
You've been in software for how long? ... ;) There's quite mixed
experiences with DMS.
FWIW, I don't think there's a huge problem w/ using test_decoding - the
output isn't pretty but it's parseable. It's too verbose due to
repeating column & type names (which also slows down), but...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-09-25 17:19:37 | Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output |
| Previous Message | Gregory Brail | 2017-09-25 17:15:49 | Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output |