Re: Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?
Date: 2017-09-17 20:45:06
Message-ID: 20170917204506.y6kmcfegakxbzm62@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/14/17 10:21, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > BTW I added --with-ldap and --with-pam to the configure line for the
> > reports in and the % covered in auth.c went from
> > 24% to 18.9% (from very bad to terribly sad).
> You can add src/test/ldap/ now to make up for some of that.

I did that (much to the chagrin of the sysadmin crew, because we now
have a new daemon on that machine -- sorry about that), and coverage of
auth.c jumped to 28%. However, if you look at the report for that file
you can see that a lot of code is not even compiled in, yet.

Clearly we have a lot of work to do in that area ...

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2017-09-17 21:17:37 Re: GnuTLS support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-09-17 19:30:49 Re: [GENERAL] Remove useless joins (VARCHAR vs TEXT)