| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
| Date: | 2017-09-13 08:03:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20170913080348.vonuawgb7xojwq23@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> The CF status of this patch turned into "Waiting on Author" by
> automated CI checking.
I object to automated turning of patches to waiting on author by
machinery. Sending occasional reminder messages to authors making them
know about outdated patches seems acceptable to me at this stage.
It'll take some time for this machinery to get perfected; only when it
is beyond experimental mode it'll be acceptable to change patches'
status in an automated fashion.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-09-13 08:08:16 | Re: Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-09-13 07:59:19 | Re: no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER name HANDLER ... |