Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands
Date: 2017-09-13 08:32:36
Message-ID: 20170913.173236.175329732.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

At Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:28:20 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20170913(dot)172820(dot)141647434(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> The context exists there before the patch but anyway using the
> context as per-portal context that doesn't need freeing seems to
> result in memory leak.

It is released at the end of vacuum.
So it's no problem.
Sorry for the noise.

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-09-13 08:42:39 Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2017-09-13 08:30:50 Re: psql - add special variable to reflect the last query status