Re: PG 10 release notes

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 05:39:31PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I have committed the first draft of the Postgres 10 release notes. They
> >> are current as of two days ago, and I will keep them current. Please
> >> give me any feedback you have.
> >
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > "Add AFTER trigger transition tables to record changed rows (Kevin Grittner)"
> >
> > Any chance I could ask for a secondary author credit here? While I
> > started out as a reviewer and I understand that we don't list those, I
> > finished up writing quite a lot of lines of committed code for this
> > (see commits 1add0b15, 8c55244a, c46c0e52, 501ed02c, f32d57fd,
> > 9e6104c6, 29fd3d9d, 304007d9, 5ebeb579) and was already listed as a
> > co-author by Kevin in the original commits (59702716, 18ce3a4a). Of
> > course I wish I'd identified and fixed all of those things *before*
> > the original commits, but that's how it played out...
> >
>
> It might be too late but I found that the following entry is
> categorized in Monitoring. But in PostgreSQL 9.6 release note, the
> feature related to default role is categorized in Permissions
> Management. I think the adding new default roles can be categorized in
> the same category to not confuse users and personally it's more
> suitable.
>
> "Add default monitoring roles (Dave Page)"

We don't have a "Permissions Management" category in PG 10 and unless we
have at least three items to add in there, I don't think it is worth
adding it.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +