From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Function to move the position of a replication slot |
Date: | 2017-09-02 22:28:12 |
Message-ID: | 20170902222812.e7qcfxqpuuvf726x@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-09-01 23:37:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 8/31/17 08:19, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> I think that, in the end, covered all the comments?
>
> > I didn't see any explanation of what this would actually be useful for.
> > I suppose you could skip over some changes you don't want replicated,
> > but how do you find to what position to skip?
>
> Um ... I can see how you might expect to skip some events in a logical
> replication stream and have a chance of things not being utterly broken.
> But how can that work for physical replication? Missed updates are
> normally spelled "unrecoverable data corruption" at that level.
Consider e.g. a standby that follows master, but isn't a target for a
failover. It can make a fair bit of sense to script things so that
there's also a slot on the standby that's marked to be the primary in
disaster cases. For that you might want to forward the slot on a regular
basis.
I don't quite see how you'd get corruption from a physical slot being
forwarded? I mean you surely can get into the situation that there's
missing WAL from wherever a standby is receiving its WAL, but that'll
"just" break replication.
- Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-02 22:31:10 | Re: Function to move the position of a replication slot |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-09-02 22:22:55 | Re: Parallel worker error |