|From:||Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>|
|To:||Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>|
|Cc:||PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tobias Bussmann <t(dot)bussmann(at)gmx(dot)net>|
|Subject:||Re: One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
* Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:24:34PM +0200, Tobias Bussmann wrote:
> > I've tested the new \gx against 10beta and current git HEAD. Actually one of my favourite features of PostgreSQL 10! However in my environment it was behaving strangely. After some debugging I found that \gx does not work if you have \set FETCH_COUNT n before. Please find attached a patch that fixes this incl. new regression test.
> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Stephen,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
Just to preempt the coming nagging email, yes, I'm aware I didn't get to
finish this today (though at least today, unlike yesterday, I looked at
it and started to play with it.. I blame the celestial bodies that
caused an impressive traffic jam on Monday night causing me to lose
basically all of Tuesday too..).
I'll provide an update tomorrow.
|Next Message||Fabien COELHO||2017-08-24 02:29:26||Re: pgbench tap tests & minor fixes|
|Previous Message||Peter Eisentraut||2017-08-23 23:15:05||Re: CONNECTION LIMIT and Parallel Query don't play well together|