| From: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: A suspicious code in pgoutput_startup(). |
| Date: | 2017-08-22 03:51:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20170822125142.d630dd72.nagata@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:23:35 -0400
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/27/17 20:52, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > 175 /* Check if we support requested protocol */
> > 176 if (data->protocol_version != LOGICALREP_PROTO_VERSION_NUM)
> > 177 ereport(ERROR,
> > 178 (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
> > 179 errmsg("client sent proto_version=%d but we only support protocol %d or lower",
> > 180 data->protocol_version, LOGICALREP_PROTO_VERSION_NUM)));
> >
> > Although the if condition is not-equal, the error message says
> > "we only support protocol %d or lower". Is this intentional?
> > Or should this be fixed as below?
> >
> > 176 if (data->protocol_version > LOGICALREP_PROTO_VERSION_NUM)
> >
> > Attached is a simple patch in case of fixing.
>
> Fixed, thanks.
Thanks, too!
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-22 04:41:23 | Re: Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values) |
| Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2017-08-22 03:51:25 | Re: A little improvementof ApplyLauncherMain loop code |