| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: global index |
| Date: | 2017-08-19 19:48:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20170819194843.dcohrxswhrpj3rie@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ildar Musin wrote:
> I found the thread about indirect indexes
> (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161018182843.xczrxsa2yd47pnru%40alvherre.pgsql),
> but it seems that it haven't been updated for some time and I couldn't
> find InMemoryIndexTuple in the latest patch. Is there a newer version?
> Generally I think this may be a good idea.
Nope, I haven't posted a version with the InMemoryIndexTuple stuff yet.
I'm working on it.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2017-08-19 19:54:08 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Account for catalog snapshot in PGXACT->xmin updates. |
| Previous Message | Mark Rofail | 2017-08-19 17:49:44 | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |