Re: More race conditions in logical replication

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: More race conditions in logical replication
Date: 2017-07-15 05:18:27
Message-ID: 20170715051827.GC2170455@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 06:48:28PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Petr Jelinek wrote:
>
> > So best idea I could come up with is to make use of the new condition
> > variable API. That lets us wait for variable which can be set per slot.
>
> Here's a cleaned up version of that patch, which I intend to get in the
> tree tomorrow. I verified that this allows the subscription tests to
> pass with Tom's sleep additions.

This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-07-15 07:46:25 Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-07-15 04:27:56 Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected