Re: shift_sjis_2004 related autority files are remaining

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shift_sjis_2004 related autority files are remaining
Date: 2017-06-23 15:15:28
Message-ID: 20170624.001528.2193927820537254688.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> For clarity, I personally perfer to keep all the source text file
> in the repository, especially so that we can detect changes of
> them. But since we decide that at least most of them not to be
> there (from a reason of license), I just don't see a reason to
> keep only the rest even without the restriction.

So are you saying that if n/m of authority files are not kept because
of license issue, then m-n authority files should not be kept as well?
What's the benefit for us by doing so?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey Burladyan 2017-06-23 15:17:47 Re: Broken hint bits (freeze)
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2017-06-23 15:04:01 Re: Same expression more than once in partition key