Re: REPLICA IDENTITY FULL

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: REPLICA IDENTITY FULL
Date: 2017-06-20 04:10:54
Message-ID: 20170620041054.frpjcpmockxd7wo3@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-06-20 11:52:10 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> If my understanding is correct, it would not be easy to fix, no?
>
> > We might be able to refine that, but there is a general problem that
> > without an index and an operator class, we are just doing our random
> > best to match the values.

I don't see the problem as being big. We should just look up the
default btree opclass and use the relevant operator. That's a how a
number of things already work.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-06-20 04:11:06 Re: [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message Mengxing Liu 2017-06-20 03:51:14 [GSOC][weekly report 3] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions