| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitriy Sarafannikov <dsarafannikov(at)yandex(dot)ru>, Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name> |
| Subject: | Re: Broken hint bits (freeze) |
| Date: | 2017-06-20 02:59:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20170620025919.GA28277@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:50:29AM +0300, Sergey Burladyan wrote:
> 20 июн. 2017 г. 1:21 пользователь "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> написал:
>
>
> We are saying that Log-Shipping should match "Latest checkpoint
> location", but the WAL for that will not be sent to the standby, so it
> will not match, but that is OK since the only thing in the non-shipped
> WAL file is the checkpoint record. How should we modify the wording on
> this?
>
>
> I am afraid that without this checkpoint record standby cannot make
> restartpoint
> and without restartpoint it does not sync shared buffers into disk at
> shutdown.
Uh, as I understand it the rsync is going to copy the missing WAL file
from the new master to the standby, right, and I think pg_controldata
too, so it should be fine. Have you tested to see if it fails?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-06-20 03:02:12 | Fix a typo in partition.c |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-06-20 02:54:41 | Re: Get stuck when dropping a subscription during synchronizing table |