Re: Misnaming of staext_dependencies_load

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Misnaming of staext_dependencies_load
Date: 2017-06-15 15:49:48
Message-ID: 20170615154948.2yyu6yt65vknfr3d@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello.
>
> It is annoying that only staext_dependencies_load is prefixed
> with "staext" (two t's) among several similar names prefixed by
> "statext"(three t's).
>
> Should we rename it to have the same prefix?

Sure. Pushed, thanks.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-06-15 15:53:18 Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-06-15 15:40:50 Re: Making server name part of the startup message