| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Anderson <neil(at)postgrescompare(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: v10beta pg_catalog diagrams |
| Date: | 2017-06-13 21:08:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20170613210817.xtiwtjnpsdlq447d@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2017-06-12 11:28:39 -0400, Neil Anderson wrote:
> I'm cross posting from general. I did some work to diagram the relationships
> in pg_catalog for v10. I would like to add it to the developer FAQ here https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#Is_there_a_diagram_of_the_system_catalogs_available.3F
> but I thought I should check if people thought it appropriate and useful
> before I do?
>
> https://www.postgrescompare.com/2017/06/11/pg_catalog_constraints.html
I wondered before if we shouldn't introduce "information only"
unenforced foreign key constraints for the catalogs. We kind of
manually do that via oidjoins, it'd be nicer if we'd a function
rechecking fkeys, and the fkeys were in the catalog...
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-06-13 21:12:13 | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-13 21:00:31 | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |