| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ludovic Vaugeois-Pepin <ludovicvp(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_basebackup error: replication slot "pg_basebackup_2194" already exists |
| Date: | 2017-05-31 18:18:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20170531181801.llmz5arlmmzoedi2@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-05-31 18:22:18 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> However, the client can't access the pid of the server as it is now,
> and its the client that has to create the name.
I don't think that's actually true? Doesn't the wire protocol always
include the PID, which is then exposed with PQbackendPID()?
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-31 18:39:31 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_basebackup error: replication slot "pg_basebackup_2194" already exists |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-31 18:09:55 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_basebackup error: replication slot "pg_basebackup_2194" already exists |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-31 18:20:13 | Re: Error while creating subscription when server is running in single user mode |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-31 18:09:55 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_basebackup error: replication slot "pg_basebackup_2194" already exists |