Re: PG10 Crash-safe and replicable Hash Indexes and UNIQUE

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG10 Crash-safe and replicable Hash Indexes and UNIQUE
Date: 2017-05-30 17:01:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:57PM -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> ? A transformOpclassLike function could verify that foo and the opcintype
> of int4_ops have the same typlen and typbyval, and that the operators and
> support procs are backed by C functions, and return a list of
> CREATE OPERATOR reusing the same functions, followed by the rewritten
> Would it be helpful to link any part of these notes to the hash index
> section of the TODO page?

I added a link to this excellent summary email based on the first
paragraph alone:

Add UNIQUE capability to hash indexes

then when I got to your suggestion at the bottom, it was already done.

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-30 17:04:06 Re: [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2017-05-30 17:01:17 Re: Surjective functional indexes