| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 Crash-safe and replicable Hash Indexes and UNIQUE |
| Date: | 2017-05-30 17:01:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20170530170134.GE2648@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:57PM -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> ? A transformOpclassLike function could verify that foo and the opcintype
> of int4_ops have the same typlen and typbyval, and that the operators and
> support procs are backed by C functions, and return a list of
> CREATE OPERATOR reusing the same functions, followed by the rewritten
> CREATE OPERATOR CLASS.
>
> Would it be helpful to link any part of these notes to the hash index
> section of the TODO page?
I added a link to this excellent summary email based on the first
paragraph alone:
Add UNIQUE capability to hash indexes
then when I got to your suggestion at the bottom, it was already done.
:-)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-30 17:04:06 | Re: [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x |
| Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2017-05-30 17:01:17 | Re: Surjective functional indexes |