Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces
Date: 2017-05-29 18:53:08
Message-ID: 20170529185308.GB28209@momjian.us (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Right now we don't document that temp_tablespaces can use
non-restart-safe storage, e.g. /tmp, ramdisks.  Would this be safe? 
Should we document this?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Petr JelinekDate: 2017-05-29 18:58:05
Subject: Re: logical replication busy-waiting on a lock
Previous:From: Jeevan LadheDate: 2017-05-29 18:42:53
Subject: Re: fix side-effect in get_qual_for_list()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group