Re: bumping HASH_VERSION to 3

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bumping HASH_VERSION to 3
Date: 2017-05-20 23:56:32
Message-ID: 20170520235632.GB17369@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:54:27PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> I will send an updated patch once we agree on above points.
> >>
> >> Sounds good.
> >
> > Attached patch addresses all the comments as discussed.
>
> Committed.

Just checking, but you reused some of my code from the 8.3-8.4 migration
in pg_upgrade that was removed a while back, rather than writing it from
scratch, right?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-21 01:00:15 Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-20 23:35:24 Re: [Q] When should I use reg* types instead of oid in the system catalog?