Re: PG10 pgindent run

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: PG10 pgindent run
Date: 2017-05-16 23:35:09
Message-ID: 20170516233509.76lujbgcukjftmoi@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-05-16 18:56:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > No clue if there's some switch that needs to be toggled on the buildfarm
> > side to accept the typedefs, I've never looked at that side of things.
>
> AFAIK, not; I think it just takes any typedef reports that aren't too
> stale.

Cool.

There we go:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2017-05-16%2023:16:53&stg=typedefs

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-16 23:36:07 Re: Hash Functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-16 22:56:57 Re: PG10 pgindent run