Re: Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables

From: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables
Date: 2017-05-16 14:26:00
Message-ID: 20170516172600.291220dc@wp.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 16 May 2017 21:36:11 +0900
Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:

> On 2017/05/16 21:11, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
> > <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> >> I agree. Maybe this issue should be added to Postgresql Open Items?
> >> I think there should be some complex solution that fixes not only
> >> triggers for foreign tables at table partitioning, but covers other
> >> possible not working cases.
>
> > I doubt if this is an open item, since DMLs on foreign tables are
> > supported since 9.3 and support to add foreign tables to inheritance
> > was added back in 9.5.
>
> I think this issue was introduced by the latter, so that was my fault.
>
> One approach I came up with to fix this issue is to rewrite the
> targetList entries of an inherited UPDATE/DELETE properly using
> rewriteTargetListUD, when generating a plan for each child table in
> inheritance_planner. Attached is a WIP patch for that. Maybe I am
> missing something, though.
>
> Best regards,
> Etsuro Fujita

I tested the patch, looks good.

--
---
Ildus Kurbangaliev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2017-05-16 15:10:39 Re: Hash Functions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-16 13:30:21 Re: [POC] hash partitioning