Re: PG 10 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10 release notes
Date: 2017-05-04 23:26:56
Message-ID: 20170504232656.GC29760@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:43:34AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello Bruce,
>
> >I have committed the first draft of the Postgres 10 release notes. They
> >are current as of two days ago, and I will keep them current. Please
> >give me any feedback you have.
>
> About:
>
> """
> Fix psql \p to always print what would be executed by \g or \w (Daniel
> Vérité)
>
> Previously \p didn't properly print the reverted-to command after a
> buffer contents reset. CLARIFY?
> """
>
> The fix is linked to the change introduced by Tom when refactoring/cleaning
> up in e984ef586 (\if) which change psql's \p behavior.
>
> This is not a user visible change version-to-version, it is more like a bug
> fix for a bug/behavioral change introduced within pg10 developement process
> itself.
>
> I'm not sure how this should appear in the release notes. Maybe not at all,
> associated to the feature in which the behavioral change was introduced...

Agreed, I removed the item and moved those commits to the \if item.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-05-04 23:28:45 Re: PG 10 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2017-05-04 23:23:32 Re: PG 10 release notes