| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu>, pawel(at)freebsd(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |
| Date: | 2017-05-04 20:26:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20170504202604.suaonm77tfj4nzzf@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-05-04 15:10:59 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > It’s X86_64, but I think(!) I can set up others via QEMU (no real hardware available).
> >
> > I have it running FreeBSD –HEAD as the base, and a always (close to) current Ports Tree.
> >
> > (and It’s ZFS, so snaps, or what ever are easy).
>
> Freebsd HEAD would be valuable on its own, "even" on x86-64. If you can
> emulate something else, that'd be good too, but I'm not sure how
> acceptable that ends up being performancewise.
Slow machines are acceptable :-) without exotic options (such as
valgrind or clobber cache) the tests shouldn't be *too* slow.
It looks like FreeBSD 11.0 supports PPC, PPC64 and ARM64 (apart from
"boring" x86 and AMD64), neither of which we have on buildfarm, so it'd
be valuable to have those, besides whatever for FreeBSD HEAD.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-04 20:30:51 | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-04 20:24:43 | Re: BUG #14643: Fails to compile with LibreSSL >= 2.5.3 |