| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ilya Shkuratov <motr(dot)ilya(at)ya(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: CTE inlining |
| Date: | 2017-04-30 23:15:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20170430231530.dfasuem2kwrfipxb@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-04-30 11:34:48 +0300, Ilya Shkuratov wrote:
> Also, I would like to remind that the disabling optimization fence is suggested
> to be OPTIONAL.
> So we don't break peoples' expectations, nor documented semantics.
I think however is that that's not good enough, because it'll surprise
people forever, whereas using something as an intentional barrier
usually is, well, intentional.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-30 23:21:33 | Re: CTE inlining |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2017-04-30 22:25:23 | Re: CTE inlining |