Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, cm(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start
Date: 2017-04-24 20:24:16
Message-ID: 20170424202416.2ikz3rwb4utffk62@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-04-24 13:16:44 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Unclear if related, but
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=gharial&dt=2017-04-24%2019%3A30%3A42
> has a suspicious timing of failing in a weird way.

Given that gharial is also failing on 9.6 (same set of commits) and
coypu fails (again same set) on 9.6
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypu&dt=2017-04-24%2018%3A20%3A33

I'm afraid it's more likely to be related.

gharial & coypu owners, any chance you could try starting postgres with
log_min_messages=debug5 on one of the affected machines?

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-24 20:26:56 Re: Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-04-24 20:18:30 Re: Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL