Re: pgbench more operators & functions

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench more operators & functions
Date: 2017-04-05 23:36:14
Message-ID: 20170405233614.74g7oglxuwkhgowb@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2017-03-16 12:21:31 -0400, David Steele wrote:
> Any reviewers want to have a look?

Unfortunately there wasn't much of that. I think that this patch
atm doesn't have sufficient design agreement to be considered for
v10. As the current CF has formally ended, I think we'll have to punt
this to v11.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-05 23:47:06 Re: Fast Default WIP patch for discussion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-05 23:33:03 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Collect and use multi-column dependency stats