Re: GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Date: 2017-04-05 22:50:39
Message-ID: 20170405225039.sjahfdlqbj72qug2@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2017-04-01 03:05:07 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [ lots of valuable discussion ]

I think this patch clearly still is in the design stage, and has
received plenty feedback this CF. I'll therefore move this to the next
commitfest.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-05 22:55:15 Re: Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-05 22:48:57 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Collect and use multi-column dependency stats