Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2017-04-05 22:45:26
Message-ID: 20170405224526.w22yxqot5nxagwtg@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2017-04-05 17:00:42 +1000, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
> Regarding test patch, I have corrected the test suite after David Steele's
> comments.
> Also, I would like to mention that a companion patch was submitted by David
> Steele up-thread.
>
> Attached the latest code and test patch.

My impression is that this'll need a couple more rounds of review. Given
that this'll establish API we'll pretty much ever going to be able to
change/remove, I think it'd be a bad idea to rush this into v10.
Therefore I propose moving this to the next CF.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-04-05 22:48:01 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-04-05 22:42:22 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.