From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statement timeout behavior in extended queries |
Date: | 2017-04-05 14:33:17 |
Message-ID: | 20170405143317.xl3dn5zagohgjnyp@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-04-05 09:46:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2017-04-05 00:39:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> but
> >> if that's what we're doing, let's make sure we do it consistently.
> >> I haven't read the patch, but the comments in this thread make me fear
> >> that it's introducing some ad-hoc, inconsistent behavior.
>
> > I'm a bit worried too due to the time constraints here, but I think
> > resetting the clock at Execute too actually makes a fair amount sense.
>
> Meh. Two days before feature freeze is not the time to be introducing
> a rushed redefinition of the wire protocol --- and let's not fool
> ourselves, that is what this amounts to. Let's push this out to v11
> and think about it more carefully.
What I was trying to say is that I think the change makes sense and
isn't particularly ad-hoc, but that I don't think we need to force this
for v10.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2017-04-05 14:33:52 | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-05 14:32:18 | Re: Logical decoding on standby |